OldiesButGoodies

Country

Kenny Rogers – I Can’t Believe Your Eyes

Kenny Rogers - I Can't Believe Your Eyes: listen with lyrics | Deezer

Introduction:

Released in 1985 on the album The Heart of the Matter, I Can’t Believe Your Eyes became a signature tune for Kenny Rogers, showcasing both his smooth baritone vocals and his talent for conveying relatable emotions. The song, which was written by Graham Hamilton Lyle and Troy Seals, wasn’t originally intended for Rogers. Lyle, one half of the songwriting duo Lyle-If, had actually offered the song to Art Garfunkel first, but Garfunkel passed on it. This turned out to be Rogers’ gain, as I Can’t Believe Your Eyes became a major hit.

The song reached number one on the Billboard Hot Country Singles chart**, a testament to its strong connection with country music audiences. But I Can’t Believe Your Eyes also crossed over to pop mainstream, peaking at number two on the Billboard Hot 100 chart**. This impressive showing solidified Kenny Rogers’ status as a successful crossover artist, equally at home on the country and pop charts. The song’s producer, Larry Butler**, is also noteworthy. A longtime collaborator with Rogers, Butler helped shape the sound of many of the singer’s most popular songs, and I Can’t Believe Your Eyes is no exception. Butler’s production choices gave the song a smooth, polished feel, perfectly complementing Roger’s vocals and the romantic theme of the lyrics.

I Can’t Believe Your Eyes is a love song, but not your typical one. The song takes the perspective of a man who is struck by the beauty of his partner**. The lyrics express feelings of disbelief and amazement**, as if he can’t quite believe his luck in being with such a stunning person. The song’s catchy melody** and relatable lyrics** helped it resonate with listeners, making it a classic of the country music genre and a significant entry in Kenny Rogers’ impressive catalog.

Video:

https://youtu.be/y1FS34Y6deY?si=yEweYv0pgOFNOkxe

Lyrics:

Would you like to dance?I’m not very good, I’ll admit itI just need a minute or twoClose to you, ’cause
I can’t believe your eyesWild and blue, warm and willingI can’t believe your eyesIs it true what they’re saying?
Women come and goSo many occasions I’d have to look twiceTo catch your second showOne look at you, that’s all I needed tonight, ’cause
I can’t believe your eyesWild and blue, warm and willingI can’t believe your eyesIs it true what they’re saying?
Don’t stop the music playingDon’t wanna lose it tonightNow that we’ve got that feelingSo good, so right
I can’t believe your eyesWild and blue, warm and willingI can’t believe your eyesIs it true what they’re saying?
I can’t believe your eyes (I can’t believe your eyes)Wild and blue, warm and willingI can’t believe your eyes (I can’t believe your eyes)Is it true what they’re saying?

Related Post

A VOICE SENT FROM HEAVEN— INDIANA’S HEARTFELT TRIBUTE TO HER BELOVED MOTHER: Last night, young Indiana walked bravely onto the stage and delivered a moving rendition of “Waltz of the Angels,” the cherished song her mother, Joey, loved so dearly. With a voice so tender and untainted, it felt as though Joey herself was singing through her daughter — every note carrying both memory and grace. In the front row, Rory Feek sat quietly among country music legends, his gaze never leaving Indiana. Beneath the brim of his hat, emotion gathered — a father witnessing not just a performance, but a sacred moment. It was more than a song; it was a bridge between heaven and earth, between a mother and her child.

Merle Haggard never avoided the hard edges of reality. His catalog was built on lived experience — incarceration while the echo of cell doors still lingered, poverty recalled without romanticism, and the complicated mix of defiance and pride in a country that rarely offered second chances. Authenticity wasn’t a marketing angle for him; it was biographical fact. Listeners trusted his voice because it carried the weight of consequences already endured. Yet there was one composition he completed and ultimately chose not to record. It wasn’t artistically flawed. It didn’t contradict his outlaw persona. In fact, it may have been the most powerful thing he ever wrote. He set it aside for a different reason: it was unfiltered to a degree that even he found unsettling. Rebellion can be theatrical. Vulnerability is not. And this particular song stripped away the mythology. Unlike his politically charged anthems or blue-collar manifestos, this piece focused on a single individual — someone who steadied him during seasons when his world was splintering. It wasn’t about national identity or personal toughness. It was about dependence. About survival made possible because another human being refused to walk away. Had it been released, the public might have seen a different portrait. Not the solitary outlaw riding against the current, but a man acknowledging that endurance is often collaborative. That strength can coexist with gratitude. And that even legends lean on someone when the stage lights go dark. Haggard understood narrative construction. Cultural icons are often shaped around independence, grit, and defiance. Gratitude, especially personal gratitude, complicates that archetype. It introduces humility into a story built on resilience. He recognized the cost of revealing that layer — and chose silence. Perhaps that silence speaks louder than the song ever could. Because when an artist whose entire career was rooted in truth decides something is “too true,” it suggests a truth that reaches beyond performance. It hints at an emotional confession that would have reframed the mythology. If that recording had surfaced, would we see Merle Haggard differently today? And who was the person he was finally prepared — perhaps privately — to thank?

On April 6, 2016, Merle Haggard quietly turned 79. There were no balloons, no spotlight cutting through the dark, no roaring audience echoing lyrics that had defined generations. Instead, there was stillness. A modest room. A body worn by time. A man who had already poured his truth into every verse he would ever sing. Phone calls came in from old friends. Somewhere nearby, his songs drifted softly through the air — familiar melodies that once filled arenas now settling gently into the background. Those closest to him sensed something unspoken. This birthday did not carry the warmth of celebration. It carried reflection. He wasn’t talking about upcoming tours. He wasn’t sketching out new plans. He simply listened — as if absorbing the quiet after a lifetime of noise. There was no grand finale, no dramatic curtain call. Just a pause. The next morning, he was gone. Country music didn’t say goodbye beneath blazing stage lights or during an emotional final encore. It lost him in the hush that followed his 79th birthday — after the candles had burned down, after the last well-wishers had hung up the phone, after the road that had called his name for decades finally fell silent. And that is what makes it linger. The final milestone he marked wasn’t a farewell performance or a triumphant send-off. It was a birthday — subdued, unfinished — that quietly closed the book on one of the most enduring voices in American country. No spectacle. No dramatic exit. Just the stillness that follows a life fully sung. Sometimes the heaviest silence is not the one after applause. It’s the one that comes when the music simply stops.

You Missed

Country

A VOICE SENT FROM HEAVEN— INDIANA’S HEARTFELT TRIBUTE TO HER BELOVED MOTHER: Last night, young Indiana walked bravely onto the stage and delivered a moving rendition of “Waltz of the Angels,” the cherished song her mother, Joey, loved so dearly. With a voice so tender and untainted, it felt as though Joey herself was singing through her daughter — every note carrying both memory and grace. In the front row, Rory Feek sat quietly among country music legends, his gaze never leaving Indiana. Beneath the brim of his hat, emotion gathered — a father witnessing not just a performance, but a sacred moment. It was more than a song; it was a bridge between heaven and earth, between a mother and her child.

Oldies Music

At 65, Barry Gibb FINALLY Opens Up About Robin’s Tragic Death in Tearful Interview… Leaving Bee Gees Fans Heartbroken!

Oldies Music

At 84, Cliff Richard Confirms What Fans Feared — The Quiet Farewell of a Living Legend

Country

Merle Haggard never avoided the hard edges of reality. His catalog was built on lived experience — incarceration while the echo of cell doors still lingered, poverty recalled without romanticism, and the complicated mix of defiance and pride in a country that rarely offered second chances. Authenticity wasn’t a marketing angle for him; it was biographical fact. Listeners trusted his voice because it carried the weight of consequences already endured. Yet there was one composition he completed and ultimately chose not to record. It wasn’t artistically flawed. It didn’t contradict his outlaw persona. In fact, it may have been the most powerful thing he ever wrote. He set it aside for a different reason: it was unfiltered to a degree that even he found unsettling. Rebellion can be theatrical. Vulnerability is not. And this particular song stripped away the mythology. Unlike his politically charged anthems or blue-collar manifestos, this piece focused on a single individual — someone who steadied him during seasons when his world was splintering. It wasn’t about national identity or personal toughness. It was about dependence. About survival made possible because another human being refused to walk away. Had it been released, the public might have seen a different portrait. Not the solitary outlaw riding against the current, but a man acknowledging that endurance is often collaborative. That strength can coexist with gratitude. And that even legends lean on someone when the stage lights go dark. Haggard understood narrative construction. Cultural icons are often shaped around independence, grit, and defiance. Gratitude, especially personal gratitude, complicates that archetype. It introduces humility into a story built on resilience. He recognized the cost of revealing that layer — and chose silence. Perhaps that silence speaks louder than the song ever could. Because when an artist whose entire career was rooted in truth decides something is “too true,” it suggests a truth that reaches beyond performance. It hints at an emotional confession that would have reframed the mythology. If that recording had surfaced, would we see Merle Haggard differently today? And who was the person he was finally prepared — perhaps privately — to thank?