Elvis Presley Rock & Roll

Elvis Presley – What Now My Love

Introduction:

The song “What Now My Love” is a timeless classic that has captured the hearts of listeners for decades. It was originally composed by Pierre Delanoë and Georges Garvarentz in 1960, and the French version, titled “Que Maintenant Je Sais”, was released in the same year.

In 1965, Elvis Presley’s version of the song was released as a single, becoming a hit in the United States and the United Kingdom. It was included on his album “For LP.” The song’s arrangement featured a lush orchestral backing and Presley’s passionate vocals, which perfectly conveyed the melancholy and longing expressed in the lyrics.

“What Now My Love” is classified as a pop ballad, a genre known for its romantic and sentimental themes. The song’s lyrics explore the pain of heartbreak and the uncertainty that follows a lost love. Presley’s rendition of the song resonated with audiences, and it remains one of his most beloved and enduring recordings.

The song’s success can be attributed to several factors, including Presley’s powerful vocals, the evocative melody, and the relatable lyrics. Presley’s ability to connect with his audience through his music was a major factor in his enduring popularity. Additionally, the song’s timeless themes of love and loss have ensured its continued relevance.

“What Now My Love” has been covered by numerous artists over the years, including Frank Sinatra, Barbra Streisand, and Engelbert Humperdinck. These cover versions have helped to keep the song alive and introduce it to new generations of listeners.

In conclusion, “What Now My Love” is a classic song that has stood the test of time. Its enduring popularity is a testament to its emotional depth and the artistry of Elvis Presley. The song’s impact on popular music is undeniable, and it continues to be cherished by fans around the world.

Video:

https://youtu.be/UpjKlOM7KQ4?si=IUUb205aTKJdpe6a

Elvis Presley – What now my love (Live 1973 Best version!) (https://youtu.be/UpjKlOM7KQ4?si=IUUb205aTKJdpe6a)

A VOICE SENT FROM HEAVEN— INDIANA’S HEARTFELT TRIBUTE TO HER BELOVED MOTHER: Last night, young Indiana walked bravely onto the stage and delivered a moving rendition of “Waltz of the Angels,” the cherished song her mother, Joey, loved so dearly. With a voice so tender and untainted, it felt as though Joey herself was singing through her daughter — every note carrying both memory and grace. In the front row, Rory Feek sat quietly among country music legends, his gaze never leaving Indiana. Beneath the brim of his hat, emotion gathered — a father witnessing not just a performance, but a sacred moment. It was more than a song; it was a bridge between heaven and earth, between a mother and her child.

At 65, Barry Gibb FINALLY Opens Up About Robin’s Tragic Death in Tearful Interview… Leaving Bee Gees Fans Heartbroken!

At 84, Cliff Richard Confirms What Fans Feared — The Quiet Farewell of a Living Legend

Merle Haggard never avoided the hard edges of reality. His catalog was built on lived experience — incarceration while the echo of cell doors still lingered, poverty recalled without romanticism, and the complicated mix of defiance and pride in a country that rarely offered second chances. Authenticity wasn’t a marketing angle for him; it was biographical fact. Listeners trusted his voice because it carried the weight of consequences already endured. Yet there was one composition he completed and ultimately chose not to record. It wasn’t artistically flawed. It didn’t contradict his outlaw persona. In fact, it may have been the most powerful thing he ever wrote. He set it aside for a different reason: it was unfiltered to a degree that even he found unsettling. Rebellion can be theatrical. Vulnerability is not. And this particular song stripped away the mythology. Unlike his politically charged anthems or blue-collar manifestos, this piece focused on a single individual — someone who steadied him during seasons when his world was splintering. It wasn’t about national identity or personal toughness. It was about dependence. About survival made possible because another human being refused to walk away. Had it been released, the public might have seen a different portrait. Not the solitary outlaw riding against the current, but a man acknowledging that endurance is often collaborative. That strength can coexist with gratitude. And that even legends lean on someone when the stage lights go dark. Haggard understood narrative construction. Cultural icons are often shaped around independence, grit, and defiance. Gratitude, especially personal gratitude, complicates that archetype. It introduces humility into a story built on resilience. He recognized the cost of revealing that layer — and chose silence. Perhaps that silence speaks louder than the song ever could. Because when an artist whose entire career was rooted in truth decides something is “too true,” it suggests a truth that reaches beyond performance. It hints at an emotional confession that would have reframed the mythology. If that recording had surfaced, would we see Merle Haggard differently today? And who was the person he was finally prepared — perhaps privately — to thank?