The Guardian view on Cliff Richard's court victory: a threat to journalism | Editorial | The Guardian

Introduction:

For more than six decades, Sir Cliff Richard has been a towering figure in British music — a name synonymous with clean-cut charm, tireless faith, and unshakable endurance. To millions, he was the eternal bachelor, the man who never aged, the wholesome idol who stood apart from rock’s chaos. But behind the glitter of stadium lights and the reassuring smile that never seemed to fade, there lies a deeper story — one of struggle, solitude, and strength.

Born Harry Roger Webb in Lucknow, India, in 1940, Cliff’s journey began far from the glamour that would later define him. His early life, once cushioned by comfort under the fading British Empire, was overturned when India gained independence in 1947. Forced to leave for postwar Britain, the Webb family found themselves in a tiny council flat, surviving harsh winters with no central heating. From those cold rooms, Harry discovered music — a refuge that expanded the walls of his small world through the sounds of Elvis Presley, Little Richard, and Buddy Holly. Music became not only an escape but a calling.

When he stepped onto the stage as Cliff Richard, a persona both sharp and safe, the transformation was complete. His 1958 hit “Move It” was revolutionary — a raw, electric anthem that many call the first true British rock-and-roll record. Yet the industry swiftly polished his image, reshaping the rebel into the boy next door. Cliff smiled for the cameras, tucked in his shirts, and became the nation’s safe sensation. Beneath the applause, though, was a young man quietly learning that fame always comes with strings attached.

By the early 1960s, Cliff Richard had conquered Britain. He sold millions, starred in films, and, for a moment, even outsold Elvis. But then the Beatles arrived — and overnight, everything changed. The cultural tide turned. Cliff, the model of polite pop, suddenly seemed out of step with a world craving rebellion. Rather than chase the chaos, he chose reflection. He turned to faith, was baptized, and reinvented himself once more — not as a rebel, but as a believer.

His devotion to Christianity cost him dearly. Some fans drifted away; others mocked his transformation. Yet Cliff stood firm. He refused to sacrifice conviction for commercial favor. While others courted scandal, he chose silence and sincerity. His songs became hymns of perseverance, even when the world no longer listened.

The years that followed brought both revival and rejection. New hits proved his resilience, but his personal life remained shrouded in mystery. He never married, never had children, and rarely revealed his heart. Then, in 2014, a false allegation threatened to destroy the integrity he had spent a lifetime building. Though never charged, the damage was done. The man who had always avoided scandal was suddenly defined by one.

And yet — he endured. He sued, he won, and he emerged quieter but unbroken. Today, Sir Cliff Richard stands as something rare in celebrity: an artist whose power lies not in confession, but in restraint. His legacy is not the noise of controversy but the strength of silence.

Because sometimes, the loudest story is the one told without a word.

Video:

You Missed

THE LAST TIME THE CROWD ROSE FOR MERLE HAGGARD — HE WOULD NEVER WALK ONSTAGE AGAIN. They carried him through the doors wrapped in the very flag he once sang about — and in the stillness that followed, there was something almost audible… a fragile echo only lifelong listeners could feel in their bones. Merle Haggard’s story closed the same way it opened: unpolished, honest, and deeply human. From being born in a converted boxcar during the Great Depression to commanding the grandest stages across America, his life unfolded like a country ballad etched in grit, regret, resilience, and redemption. Every lyric he sang carried the weight of lived experience — prison walls, hard roads, blue-collar truths, and hard-earned second chances. Those who stood beside his casket said the atmosphere felt thick, as if the room itself refused to forget the sound of his voice. It wasn’t just grief in the air — it was reverence. A stillness reserved for someone whose music had become stitched into the fabric of ordinary lives. One of his sons leaned close and murmured, “He didn’t really leave us. He’s just playing somewhere higher.” And perhaps that’s the only explanation that makes sense. Because artists like Merle don’t simply vanish. They transform. They become the crackle of an AM radio drifting through a late-night highway. They become the soundtrack of worn leather seats and long stretches of open road. They live in jukebox corners, in dance halls, in quiet kitchens where memories linger longer than the coffee. Somewhere tonight, a trucker tunes in to an old melody. Somewhere, an aging cowboy lowers his hat and blinks back tears. And somewhere in that gentle hum of steel guitar and sorrow, a whisper carries through: “Merle’s home.”